Though I believe that Prensky has brought up some interesting points about how the digital age may have affected teacher-student dynamics and education, there have been some myths found associated with his ideas. An article by Kirschner (2017) gathered some evidence to outline a few of the myths in Presnky's work. Kirschner discusses that being a 'digital native' doesn't necessarily mean one is 'digitally literate.' What I think he means by this is that growing up with technology does not necessarily mean one knows how to use it in ways that further their learning. The article states, "... while students appear to use a large quantity and variety of technologies for communication, learning, staying connected with their friends and engaging with the world around them, they are using them primarily for “personal empowerment and entertainment, but not always digitally literate in using technology to support their learning..." (Kirschner, 2017). This statement shows that the term "digital native" doesn't really hold the meaning Prensky claims it does. This is because even though people grew up with technology, they still must learn how to be 'literate' with technology which is evidently shown to not always be the case.
Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67(67), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
Prensky, M. (2012). From digital natives to digital wisdom : hopeful essays for 21st century learning. Corwin.
Here is a helpful quick video defining digital natives and digital immigrants for some more details:
No comments:
Post a Comment